![]() Resolution of certain contradictions and inconsistencies between the neurological evidence and Freudian dream theory are discussed. On this view, dream bizarreness arises, in part, through inter-drive competition preventing direct expression of wishes and the subsequent formation of substitute aims. However, Freud’s alternative account of repression, in terms of cognitive inhibition instigated by motivational conflict, is developed and discussed in relation to neural inhibition. social-psychology-from-stephen-franzoi-6th-edition-pdf-book 2/10 Downloaded from on Octoby Suny b Murray Social Psychology is designed as a road map to this rapidly growing and important eld and provides individuals with a simple, clear, jargon-free introduction. ![]() homosexuality, and bisexuality refer to classes of social and sexual. Freud’s account of the ‘dream-censor’, acting as an agency intentionally disguising cognitive content, is found to be problematic. seen a torrent of research on human behavior, drawing from diverse fields such. An analysis of disguise-censorship and repression reveals two competing accounts in Freud’s theory. The discussion to date, however, has neglected the conceptual basis of repression and disguise-censorship and this paper aims to clarify the role of repression in dreaming and its contribution to dream bizarreness. One particular area of contention in discussions of Freudian dream theory and its relation to the neuroscientific evidence is the notion of ‘disguise-censorship’ and its relation to dream bizarreness.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |